<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blogonomist &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogonomist.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogonomist.com</link>
	<description>All Things Blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Top 10 Media Properties in the USA</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonomist.com/the-top-10-media-properties-in-the-usa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonomist.com/the-top-10-media-properties-in-the-usa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Baumann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogonomist.com/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I always liked Top 10 list about the media industry. According to Silicon Insider, these are the 10 biggest media properties in the USA:


1. Google: 128 million unique visitors
2. Microsoft: 123 million
3. Yahoo: 116 million
4. Time Warner: 108 million
5. News Corp.: 79 million
6. eBay: 66 million
7. InterActiveCorp.: 65 million
8. Wikimedia Foundation: 57 million
9. Amazon: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I always liked Top 10 list about the media industry. According to <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/6/nbc_u_weather_com_top_10_web_property">Silicon Insider</a>, these are the 10 biggest media properties in the USA:</p>
<p><span id="more-256"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>1. <strong>Google</strong>: 128 million unique visitors</li>
<li>2. <strong>Microsoft</strong>: 123 million</li>
<li>3. <strong>Yahoo</strong>: 116 million</li>
<li>4. T<strong>ime Warner</strong>: 108 million</li>
<li>5. <strong>News Corp.</strong>: 79 million</li>
<li>6. <strong>eBay</strong>: 66 million</li>
<li>7. <strong>InterActiveCorp.</strong>: 65 million</li>
<li>8. <strong>Wikimedia Foundatio</strong>n: 57 million</li>
<li>9. <strong>Amazon</strong>: 55 million</li>
<li>10. <strong>NBC Universal</strong>: 51.2 million (estimated unduplicated audience after Weather.com acquisition)</li>
</ol>
<p>Mmmh.. very interesting. In the &#8216;old days&#8217; there were only traditional conglomerates like Time Warner and Disney on this list. Now you&#8217;ll notice online retailers like Amazon, auction platform eBay and open source encyclopedia Wikipedia. By the way: Where is Disney? Also noteworthy: With the acquisition of Weather.com, NBC will push the New York Times, the largest newspaper company on the Web, off the list&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonomist.com/the-top-10-media-properties-in-the-usa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google CEO: &#8220;Moral Imperative&#8221; to Help Newspapers</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonomist.com/google-ceo-moral-imperative-to-help-newspapers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonomist.com/google-ceo-moral-imperative-to-help-newspapers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Baumann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogonomist.com/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of tension between the newspaper industry and search giant Google lately. Old media executives on both sides of the Atlantic believe that the Big G is going to destroy the business model of print media with its (free) online new aggregator Google News. CEO Eric Schmidt believes that a total [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of tension between the newspaper industry and search giant Google lately. Old media executives on both sides of the Atlantic believe that the Big G is going to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/06/AR2007040601967.html">destroy the business model of print media</a> with its (free) online new aggregator Google News. CEO Eric Schmidt believes that a total misconception. In a recent <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9966236-7.html">interview with the New Yorker&#8217;s media reporter Ken Auletta</a>, he said that media companies should see Google not as an enemy but as an ally that&#8217;s trying to make advertising work on the Internet. He even emphasized Google&#8217;s interest in a prosperous future of the newspapers. &#8220;It&#8217;s a huge moral imperative to help here&#8221;, he said. Google&#8217;s goal &#8220;isn&#8217;t to monetize everything. The goal is to change the world. … We don&#8217;t have an evil meter.&#8221; <span id="more-252"></span></p>
<p><strong>My take:</strong> 1. Newspaper must learn to embrace Google instead of fighting it. Plus: They won&#8217;t be able successfully monetize their content on the World Wide Web by themselves in the long run (the Big G is already too dominant in online advertising). 2. I am sure these comments by Eric Schmidt weren&#8217;t exactly consoling for the old media managers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonomist.com/google-ceo-moral-imperative-to-help-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Master Plan on Seattle Bus</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonomist.com/google-masterplan-on-seattle-bus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonomist.com/google-masterplan-on-seattle-bus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Baumann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcbaumann.com/google-masterplan-on-seattle-bus</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since the infamous original Google master plan - a semi-humorous plan with upcoming Google services created by employers &#8211; was erased from the big lobby whiteboard at the Googleplex in Mountain View, fans of the &#8216;Big G&#8217; have been wondering if there ever would be a sequel to it.
Well, apparently there is. Engineers from Google&#8217;s branch in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Google Masterplan" href="http://www.blogonomist.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/google_masterplan.jpg"><img src="http://www.blogonomist.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/google_masterplan.jpg" alt="Google Masterplan" /></a>Ever since the infamous original <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2006/08/googles-master-plan.html">Google master plan</a> - a semi-humorous plan with upcoming Google services created by employers &#8211; was <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2006/11/full-google-master-plan-10.html">erased</a> from the big lobby whiteboard at the Googleplex in Mountain View, fans of the &#8216;Big G&#8217; have been wondering if there ever would be a sequel to it.</p>
<p>Well, apparently there is. Engineers from Google&#8217;s branch in Seattle put their idea of a new master plan on a couple of local busses (see photo above, more <a href="http://andrewhitchcock.org/gallery/v/misc/googlebus/">pictures</a>).</p>
<p>Turns out &#8211; this is &#8216;advertising in motion&#8217; and part of Google&#8217;s effort to make young web geniuses check out its job listings. Definitely a creative way to recruit new talent! We&#8217;ll see if G&#8217;s Seattle branch (<a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/jobs/seattle/">funny website</a>, btw) will make more headlines soon&#8230;</p>
<p>P.S. The erased original Google master plan has a <a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/cdibona/RIPGoogleMasterPlan">great shrine</a> on Picasa. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonomist.com/google-masterplan-on-seattle-bus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;Google Generation&#8221; &#8211; No Search Experts</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonomist.com/the-google-generation-no-search-experts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonomist.com/the-google-generation-no-search-experts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Baumann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcbaumann.com/the-google-generation-no-search-experts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahh, clichés. Aren&#8217;t older people supposed to be technical ignorants and &#8220;web allergic&#8221;, while the younger guys and girls surf, chat and entertain themselves on the web 24/7? Well, apparenty that&#8217;s wrong.  A new UK report (PDF version) on the habits of the &#8220;Google Generation&#8221; finds that kids born since 1993 aren&#8217;t quite the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, clichés. Aren&#8217;t older people supposed to be technical ignorants and &#8220;web allergic&#8221;, while the younger guys and girls surf, chat and entertain themselves on the web 24/7? Well, apparenty that&#8217;s wrong.  A new UK report (<a href="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/reppres/gg_final_keynote_11012008.pdf">PDF version</a>) on the habits of the &#8220;Google Generation&#8221; finds that kids born since 1993 <strong>aren&#8217;t quite the internet super-geeks</strong> they&#8217;re sometimes made out to be.</p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s true that young people are generally competent with technology, but it&#8217;s not true that students today are &#8220;expert searchers.&#8221; In fact, the report calls this &#8220;a dangerous myth.&#8221;But these are some truths about the &#8220;Google generation&#8221;, according to the report:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>They like to cut-and-paste.</strong> &#8220;There is a lot of anecdotal evidence and plagiarism is a serious issue.&#8221;</li>
<li><strong>They prefer visual information over text</strong>. &#8220;But text is still important&#8230; For library interfaces, there is evidence that multimedia can quickly lose its appeal, providing short-term novelty.&#8221;</li>
<li><strong>They multitask all the time.</strong> &#8220;It is likely that being exposed to online media early in life may help to develop good parallel processing skills.&#8221;</li>
<p>Does that mean they don&#8217;t care about copyrights, get easily bored about lengthy investigative magazine articles and suffer from ADD big time?? Well, somehow I expected a little bit more. Good news: We, the &#8220;older people&#8221; (meaning over 30), still have some chances to compete in the digital age&#8230;.</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonomist.com/the-google-generation-no-search-experts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The East Coast vs. West Coast Christmas Search Competition</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonomist.com/christmas-search-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonomist.com/christmas-search-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 03:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Baumann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcbaumann.com/the-east-coast-vs-west-coast-christmas-search-competition</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting into the holiday spirit, I decided to use Google Universal Search in order to find any indication if Los Angeles &#8211; the town I live &#8211; has the slightest chance against infamous christmas-y New York.
Like many others who love L.A. I get shocked when December approaches and I become aware that this city doesn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting into the holiday spirit, I decided to use <a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/universalsearch_20070516.html">Google Universal Search</a> in order to find any indication if Los Angeles &#8211; the town I live &#8211; has the slightest chance against infamous christmas-y New York.</p>
<p>Like many others who love L.A. I get shocked when December approaches and I become aware that this city doesn&#8217;t have a official Christmas tree. But one can still hope&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://img.skitch.com/20081212-qyn87tsemtpes7xk7s7auct6be.jpg" alt="newyork_christmas.jpg 494�28 pixels"/></p>
<p>Google&#8217;s <a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/universalsearch_20070516.html">universal search</a> (meaning the inclusion of any keyword-related results, such as pictures, books, news stories etc.) for &#8220;New York Christmas&#8221; not only lists nice pictures of Christmas trees in the &#8220;Big Apple&#8221;, but also news stories about Billy Joel&#8217;s anti-war Christmas single.</p>
<p>And some New York residents actually OBJECTING a public Christmas tree!</p>
<p>What about the &#8220;Los Angeles Christmas&#8221;? Oh my, the search results paint a sad, sad picture. No L.A. related Christmas photos, no YouTube videos, no relevant books. Nothing. Zilch.</p>
<p><a title="Los Angeles Christmas Search" href="http://www.blogonomist.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/losangeles_christmas.jpg"><img src="http://www.blogonomist.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/losangeles_christmas.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Christmas Search" width="494" height="328" /></a></p>
<p>The only Lala Land relevant Christmas &#8216;universal&#8217; search result is a news article about &#8220;24&#8243; TV star Kiefer Sutherland who will spend Xmas in prison for his second arrest for drunk-driving!</p>
<p>Depressing &#8211; but so L.A.!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonomist.com/christmas-search-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Interesting Search Facts I Learned Today</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonomist.com/10-interesting-search-facts-i-learned-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonomist.com/10-interesting-search-facts-i-learned-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Baumann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogonomist.com/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, there were gazillions of search news out there todays, but I thought these were some of the most interesting insights:
- With 20 billion to 35 billion worldwide searches in 2006/2007, search growth is as strong as ever. (Via ClickZ)
- Google remained in the top spot for search queries in the United States, accounted for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there were gazillions of search news out there todays, but I thought these were some of the most interesting insights:</p>
<p>- With 20 billion to 35 billion worldwide searches in 2006/2007, search growth is as strong as ever. (Via <a href="http://www.clickz.com/3627806">ClickZ</a>)</p>
<p>- Google remained in the top spot for search queries in the United States, accounted for 64.49 percent of all searches (<a href="http://www.hitwise.com/press-center/hitwiseHS2004/google64ussearches.php">Hitwise</a>)</p>
<p>- More than $14 billion has been spent online during the holiday season-to-date &#8211; a 17 percent gain compared with the corresponding days last year. (via <a href="http://www.marketingvox.com/archives/2007/12/07/holiday-e-commerce-spending-reaches-14-billion-up-17-vs-last-year/?camp=newsletter&amp;src=mv&amp;type=textlink">MarketingVox</a>)</p>
<p>- Nearly 400 million Google search referrals are to its own multimedia properties. (via <a href="http://www.clickz.com/3627806">ClickZ</a>)</p>
<p>- Local search is expected to grow from rougly $2.5 billion today to $5 billion in 2008. (via <a href="http://searchengineland.com/071207-163012.php">SearchEngineLand</a>).</p>
<p>- In the third quarter of this year, more than one of four clicks on ads running on content networks like Google&#8217;s AdSense and the Yahoo Publisher Network was fraudulent. (via <a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=72295">Mediapost</a>)</p>
<p>- The caches of major search engines are still providing a safe hiding place for malicious code. (<a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;taxonomyName=network_security&amp;articleId=9051699&amp;taxonomyId=142&amp;intsrc=kc_top">Computerworld</a>)</p>
<p>- Google will very soon begin treating subdomains not as separate domains, but the same as subdirectories. (via <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3509806.htm">Webmasterworld</a>)</p>
<p>- Search Engines can help you to find a &#8220;dead&#8221; spouse. (via SearchEngineLand)</p>
<p>- And last, but not least: Larry Page, the world&#8217;s only remaining bachelor Google billionaire, is getting married today. (via <a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=3969679&amp;page=1">ABC News</a>)</p>
<p>Congratulations, Larry! Hope your first child will have cute <a href="http://flickr.com/groups/googlyeyesproject/" target="_self">googly eyes</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonomist.com/10-interesting-search-facts-i-learned-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Adds Scheduling Features To Adwords</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonomist.com/google-adds-scheduling-features-to-adwords-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonomist.com/google-adds-scheduling-features-to-adwords-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 22:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Baumann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcbaumann.com/google-adds-scheduling-features-to-adwords-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting. In a bid to offer functionality already provided by Microsoft&#8217;s adCenter, Google AdWords will be releasing a new ad scheduling feature in the coming weeks, allowing advertisers to schedule their ads for weekends or weekdays only, or other specified days of the week, according to a post by Jennifer Slegg on the Search Engine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. In a bid to offer functionality already provided by Microsoft&#8217;s adCenter, Google <a href="https://adwords.google.com/select/">AdWords</a> will be releasing a new ad scheduling feature in the coming weeks, allowing advertisers to schedule their ads for weekends or weekdays only, or other specified days of the week, according to a <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060524-224819">post </a>by Jennifer Slegg on the Search Engine Watch blog (via <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/05/google-adwords-dayparting-coming-soon.html">Marketing Pilgrim</a>). Dayparting will also be available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonomist.com/google-adds-scheduling-features-to-adwords-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.249 seconds -->
