<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blogonomist &#187; Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogonomist.com/tag/search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogonomist.com</link>
	<description>All Things Blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Master Plan on Seattle Bus</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonomist.com/google-masterplan-on-seattle-bus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonomist.com/google-masterplan-on-seattle-bus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Baumann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcbaumann.com/google-masterplan-on-seattle-bus</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since the infamous original Google master plan - a semi-humorous plan with upcoming Google services created by employers &#8211; was erased from the big lobby whiteboard at the Googleplex in Mountain View, fans of the &#8216;Big G&#8217; have been wondering if there ever would be a sequel to it.
Well, apparently there is. Engineers from Google&#8217;s branch in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Google Masterplan" href="http://www.blogonomist.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/google_masterplan.jpg"><img src="http://www.blogonomist.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/google_masterplan.jpg" alt="Google Masterplan" /></a>Ever since the infamous original <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2006/08/googles-master-plan.html">Google master plan</a> - a semi-humorous plan with upcoming Google services created by employers &#8211; was <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2006/11/full-google-master-plan-10.html">erased</a> from the big lobby whiteboard at the Googleplex in Mountain View, fans of the &#8216;Big G&#8217; have been wondering if there ever would be a sequel to it.</p>
<p>Well, apparently there is. Engineers from Google&#8217;s branch in Seattle put their idea of a new master plan on a couple of local busses (see photo above, more <a href="http://andrewhitchcock.org/gallery/v/misc/googlebus/">pictures</a>).</p>
<p>Turns out &#8211; this is &#8216;advertising in motion&#8217; and part of Google&#8217;s effort to make young web geniuses check out its job listings. Definitely a creative way to recruit new talent! We&#8217;ll see if G&#8217;s Seattle branch (<a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/jobs/seattle/">funny website</a>, btw) will make more headlines soon&#8230;</p>
<p>P.S. The erased original Google master plan has a <a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/cdibona/RIPGoogleMasterPlan">great shrine</a> on Picasa. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonomist.com/google-masterplan-on-seattle-bus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;Google Generation&#8221; &#8211; No Search Experts</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonomist.com/the-google-generation-no-search-experts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonomist.com/the-google-generation-no-search-experts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Baumann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcbaumann.com/the-google-generation-no-search-experts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahh, clichés. Aren&#8217;t older people supposed to be technical ignorants and &#8220;web allergic&#8221;, while the younger guys and girls surf, chat and entertain themselves on the web 24/7? Well, apparenty that&#8217;s wrong.  A new UK report (PDF version) on the habits of the &#8220;Google Generation&#8221; finds that kids born since 1993 aren&#8217;t quite the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, clichés. Aren&#8217;t older people supposed to be technical ignorants and &#8220;web allergic&#8221;, while the younger guys and girls surf, chat and entertain themselves on the web 24/7? Well, apparenty that&#8217;s wrong.  A new UK report (<a href="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/reppres/gg_final_keynote_11012008.pdf">PDF version</a>) on the habits of the &#8220;Google Generation&#8221; finds that kids born since 1993 <strong>aren&#8217;t quite the internet super-geeks</strong> they&#8217;re sometimes made out to be.</p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s true that young people are generally competent with technology, but it&#8217;s not true that students today are &#8220;expert searchers.&#8221; In fact, the report calls this &#8220;a dangerous myth.&#8221;But these are some truths about the &#8220;Google generation&#8221;, according to the report:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>They like to cut-and-paste.</strong> &#8220;There is a lot of anecdotal evidence and plagiarism is a serious issue.&#8221;</li>
<li><strong>They prefer visual information over text</strong>. &#8220;But text is still important&#8230; For library interfaces, there is evidence that multimedia can quickly lose its appeal, providing short-term novelty.&#8221;</li>
<li><strong>They multitask all the time.</strong> &#8220;It is likely that being exposed to online media early in life may help to develop good parallel processing skills.&#8221;</li>
<p>Does that mean they don&#8217;t care about copyrights, get easily bored about lengthy investigative magazine articles and suffer from ADD big time?? Well, somehow I expected a little bit more. Good news: We, the &#8220;older people&#8221; (meaning over 30), still have some chances to compete in the digital age&#8230;.</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonomist.com/the-google-generation-no-search-experts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The East Coast vs. West Coast Christmas Search Competition</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonomist.com/christmas-search-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonomist.com/christmas-search-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 03:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Baumann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcbaumann.com/the-east-coast-vs-west-coast-christmas-search-competition</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting into the holiday spirit, I decided to use Google Universal Search in order to find any indication if Los Angeles &#8211; the town I live &#8211; has the slightest chance against infamous christmas-y New York.
Like many others who love L.A. I get shocked when December approaches and I become aware that this city doesn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting into the holiday spirit, I decided to use <a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/universalsearch_20070516.html">Google Universal Search</a> in order to find any indication if Los Angeles &#8211; the town I live &#8211; has the slightest chance against infamous christmas-y New York.</p>
<p>Like many others who love L.A. I get shocked when December approaches and I become aware that this city doesn&#8217;t have a official Christmas tree. But one can still hope&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://img.skitch.com/20081212-qyn87tsemtpes7xk7s7auct6be.jpg" alt="newyork_christmas.jpg 494�28 pixels"/></p>
<p>Google&#8217;s <a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/universalsearch_20070516.html">universal search</a> (meaning the inclusion of any keyword-related results, such as pictures, books, news stories etc.) for &#8220;New York Christmas&#8221; not only lists nice pictures of Christmas trees in the &#8220;Big Apple&#8221;, but also news stories about Billy Joel&#8217;s anti-war Christmas single.</p>
<p>And some New York residents actually OBJECTING a public Christmas tree!</p>
<p>What about the &#8220;Los Angeles Christmas&#8221;? Oh my, the search results paint a sad, sad picture. No L.A. related Christmas photos, no YouTube videos, no relevant books. Nothing. Zilch.</p>
<p><a title="Los Angeles Christmas Search" href="http://www.blogonomist.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/losangeles_christmas.jpg"><img src="http://www.blogonomist.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/losangeles_christmas.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Christmas Search" width="494" height="328" /></a></p>
<p>The only Lala Land relevant Christmas &#8216;universal&#8217; search result is a news article about &#8220;24&#8243; TV star Kiefer Sutherland who will spend Xmas in prison for his second arrest for drunk-driving!</p>
<p>Depressing &#8211; but so L.A.!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonomist.com/christmas-search-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Interesting Search Facts I Learned Today</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonomist.com/10-interesting-search-facts-i-learned-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonomist.com/10-interesting-search-facts-i-learned-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Baumann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogonomist.com/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, there were gazillions of search news out there todays, but I thought these were some of the most interesting insights:
- With 20 billion to 35 billion worldwide searches in 2006/2007, search growth is as strong as ever. (Via ClickZ)
- Google remained in the top spot for search queries in the United States, accounted for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there were gazillions of search news out there todays, but I thought these were some of the most interesting insights:</p>
<p>- With 20 billion to 35 billion worldwide searches in 2006/2007, search growth is as strong as ever. (Via <a href="http://www.clickz.com/3627806">ClickZ</a>)</p>
<p>- Google remained in the top spot for search queries in the United States, accounted for 64.49 percent of all searches (<a href="http://www.hitwise.com/press-center/hitwiseHS2004/google64ussearches.php">Hitwise</a>)</p>
<p>- More than $14 billion has been spent online during the holiday season-to-date &#8211; a 17 percent gain compared with the corresponding days last year. (via <a href="http://www.marketingvox.com/archives/2007/12/07/holiday-e-commerce-spending-reaches-14-billion-up-17-vs-last-year/?camp=newsletter&amp;src=mv&amp;type=textlink">MarketingVox</a>)</p>
<p>- Nearly 400 million Google search referrals are to its own multimedia properties. (via <a href="http://www.clickz.com/3627806">ClickZ</a>)</p>
<p>- Local search is expected to grow from rougly $2.5 billion today to $5 billion in 2008. (via <a href="http://searchengineland.com/071207-163012.php">SearchEngineLand</a>).</p>
<p>- In the third quarter of this year, more than one of four clicks on ads running on content networks like Google&#8217;s AdSense and the Yahoo Publisher Network was fraudulent. (via <a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=72295">Mediapost</a>)</p>
<p>- The caches of major search engines are still providing a safe hiding place for malicious code. (<a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;taxonomyName=network_security&amp;articleId=9051699&amp;taxonomyId=142&amp;intsrc=kc_top">Computerworld</a>)</p>
<p>- Google will very soon begin treating subdomains not as separate domains, but the same as subdirectories. (via <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3509806.htm">Webmasterworld</a>)</p>
<p>- Search Engines can help you to find a &#8220;dead&#8221; spouse. (via SearchEngineLand)</p>
<p>- And last, but not least: Larry Page, the world&#8217;s only remaining bachelor Google billionaire, is getting married today. (via <a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=3969679&amp;page=1">ABC News</a>)</p>
<p>Congratulations, Larry! Hope your first child will have cute <a href="http://flickr.com/groups/googlyeyesproject/" target="_self">googly eyes</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonomist.com/10-interesting-search-facts-i-learned-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Interesting Insights About Internet Use In Europe</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonomist.com/10-insights-about-internet-use-in-europe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonomist.com/10-insights-about-internet-use-in-europe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 01:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Baumann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcbaumann.com/10-insights-about-internet-use-in-europe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you always wanted to know how internet savvy the Europeans really are? Here are a couple of interesting facts &#8211; fresh off the press and provided by Eurostat, the statistical office of the European communities:

Internet access across the EU is increasing, with 54 per cent of households having access of some sort, compared 49 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you always wanted to know how internet savvy the Europeans really are? Here are a couple of interesting facts &#8211; <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO0712/S00162.htm">fresh</a> off the press and provided by <a href="http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page?_pageid=1090,30070682,1090_33076576&amp;_dad=portal&amp;_schema=PORTAL">Eurostat</a>, the statistical office of the European communities:</p>
<ul>
<li>Internet access across the EU is increasing, with 54 per cent of households having access of some sort, compared 49 per cent last year.</li>
<li>The highest proportions of households with internet access were recorded in the nordic countries: Netherlands (83%), Sweden (79%) and Denmark (78%).</li>
<li>The UK, usually know as internet savvy and technologically advanced, is trailing the Nordic leader with 67%.</li>
<li>57% of individuals had used internet search engines.</li>
<li>50% had sent e-mails with attachments.</li>
<li>30% said they kept viruses and spyware off their computers.</li>
<li>25% of individuals had taken part in chatrooms, newsgroups or online discussions.</li>
<li>15% had used the internet to make phone calls.</li>
<li>Peer to peer file sharing for exchange of movies and music had been used by 13%.</li>
<li>Only 10% had created a web page.</li>
</ul>
<p>Despite the fact that most of these numbers are lower than the ones in the United States, this study proves that internet access is gradually extending across the 27 states of the European Union &#8211; especially broadband connections have risen sharply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonomist.com/10-insights-about-internet-use-in-europe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How search is redefining the Web — and our lives</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonomist.com/how-search-is-redefining-the-web-%e2%80%94-and-our-lives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonomist.com/how-search-is-redefining-the-web-%e2%80%94-and-our-lives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Baumann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcbaumann.com/how-search-is-redefining-the-web-%e2%80%94-and-our-lives</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recap. I found an great article by The Seattle Times from 2005 about the growing importance of internet search, how it effects our lives and how search engines help us in our daily quest for information. Most of the numbers are outdated, but the basic info where search is headed is still true today. Here [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recap. I found an <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002259118_search01.html">great article</a> by The Seattle Times from 2005 about the growing importance of internet search, how it effects our lives and how search engines help us in our daily quest for information. Most of the numbers are outdated, but the basic info where search is headed is still true today. Here are a couple of facts I found interesting:
<ul>
<li>Three quarters of U.S. Internet users, or about 120 million people, have used engines, searching an average of 38 times a month.</li>
<li>As a business, search brought in $4 billion in sales last year, and will become a bigger cash cow as its power and influence grows.</li>
<li>Microsoft found that people search an average of 11 minutes before they find what they are looking for.</li>
<li>The first search engine was created in 1990 by a college student in Montreal and named &#8220;Archie&#8221; — a variation on the word archive. There wasn&#8217;t even much of a Web at that point, and Archie was mainly used to dig through public file-exchange sites.</li>
<li>Google is the most popular engine today, home to 35 percent of Web searches. It receives hundreds of millions of requests every day.</li>
<li>Google hit the $1 billion quarterly sales mark in 2004, just five years after its official launch.</li>
<li>Search engines are going after more eyeballs by adding their own content, and now offer users street maps, phone numbers, weather forecasts and even answers to algebra problems. Many also offer separate search-based shopping and news services.</li>
<li>Web users add more public information daily. A group of University of California researchers estimated the size of the public Web at least tripled from 2000 to 2003, when it contained 167 terabytes of data. That&#8217;s equal to about 560,000 sets of the Encyclopædia Britannica.</li>
<li>Experts say the search technology will jump digital boundaries from the browser to other platforms. Its next stop is the cellphone; in the future, television.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonomist.com/how-search-is-redefining-the-web-%e2%80%94-and-our-lives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 4 Percent of Search Queries Matter Most</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonomist.com/top-4-percent-of-queries-matter-most/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonomist.com/top-4-percent-of-queries-matter-most/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 02:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Baumann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcbaumann.com/top-4-percent-of-queries-matter-most</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Optimizing a site for the top 4 percent of search queries will improve site search results for half of all searchers, according to a study by the Patricia Seybold Group using anonymous data from WebSideStory&#8217;s clients.
According to the data, just 4 percent of all unique search queries made up more than half of all site [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Optimizing a site for the top 4 percent of search queries will improve site search results for half of all searchers, according to a study by the <a href="http://www.psgroup.com/">Patricia Seybold Group</a> using anonymous data from <a href="http://www.websidestory.com/">WebSideStory&#8217;s</a> clients.<br />
<blockquote>According to the data, just 4 percent of all unique search queries made up more than half of all site searches. For e-commerce sites, the number of unique queries fell to just 2 percent. (&#8230;) &#8220;Marketers should be thinking about site search with the &#8216;80/20 rule&#8217; in mind, and pay attention to the areas where they&#8217;ll get the most bang for their buck,&#8221; Steve Kusmer, senior VP and general manager of WebSideStory&#8217;s search and content solutions division, told ClickZ. &#8220;They should address site search tuning by looking at the top keywords first.&#8221; (&#8230;)The site search box itself is a tremendous gift to you from your customers: they are telling you exactly what they want, in their own words,&#8221; writes Aldrich, who provides a five-step plan for site search improvement in her report.The importance of guiding site search users is magnified because those searchers are 2.7 times as likely to convert than the average site visitor, according to Kusmer. That is in part due to the nature of site search users, who are in effect pre-qualifying themselves as users interested in finding something very specific on a site. A well directed user experience created by good site search results also leads to increased conversions, he added.(Via <a href="http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3611296">ClickZ</a>) </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonomist.com/top-4-percent-of-queries-matter-most/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.316 seconds -->
